My posts are indiscrete. At a
point I belong. At others I veer off. In this one for instance, why should it
bother anyone? I write;
In the modern world, a family is
me, my wife and my two kids, a girl and a boy. To tell either of the two that
he or she is the firstborn is like crowning a king with no empire. We know that
Africa isn’t yet modern (struggling to be modern) and we of the rural side are
first borns among many siblings.
A firstborn was given a treasured
name, his mother was probably the first wife of the man, in some cultures he
was the only heir to his entire father’s livestock’s, farms and wives. He was
respected and revered and from that he gained his strength to protect the
reputation of the father and guide the family for the better. As if gods knew
whom to give wisdom and courage, firstborns exhibited these characteristics.
You could not compare him to the younger ones (remember there was no one like a
last born lest the father was dead though it wasn’t applauded because the last
child was even younger to the children of the first son. It was womanish to
claim last born position but to work and outdo the first in skill and
achievement)
But the times son of soil lives in
have different challenges for the first male. He is born in a family of want. He starts by having no person to look after him, to make him be at peace. The
father decided not to marry two or three wives at the missionary’s command
hence more than ten children with a single wife. By refuting extended family world, the
children are taught how to be selfish. They become selfish even to brothers and
sisters. It won’t bother an ignorant first born. It bothers the concerned one.
I have been talking to my peers
who are eldest among their siblings. Their expressions are challenges they
encounter on a daily basis. The expectations their younger siblings have of
them are but shame, misunderstandings and guilt. They understand the world more
than their parents. They know the needs of the modern child more than the
parents know hence have to provide for the very children. And if you fail to
provide them, on their assumed capability that you have, it ends up being a
life long tussle that my elder brother never supported me here or there.
When the elder boys or girls lack
a congenial at home- father or mother, they seek it out in their peers and
friends. I am not into going home like any other equally perceptive guy. It is
better to be with my friends away because there are no cousins and ‘father’ to
offer the belonging friends can. Homes are small and tasks confined. Who wants
to zero graze? Siblings are present, yes but we find difficult to talk at the
same reasoning for it may end up conflicting. Peace seems present in absentia.
As we gain courage to take up the
role of aiding and supporting our smaller siblings we are engulfed in
loneliness and desperation. Some have told me that younger siblings are like
ones children that he should support in education and life. That would make
late his marriage and siring. The lesson leant from all this is to keep a small
healthy family whose disadvantages think are less than advantages.
Are you a first born in a big
family?
|
Conditions at home make the first born a child, no support to make him grow. |
I appreciate your work. Quite true. This is what we first borns in large family go through. All responsibilities and eyes on us
ReplyDelete