Stupid Interviews- Attending one?

My friend and I have for some times mocked best what we think does not favour our needs. It is the talk of any graduate how many job opportunities are there. There used to be times when looking at the vacancy pages in the newspaper promised a bright future. Now the pages have a taste of the orbituaries. Our impatience suggests that it is easy to die than get a job.

It starts by writing your curriculum vitae. Vitae is an indirect slave card. ‘Here I am Mr. Enslaver. A qualified slave full of experience. I slaved in school, more than fifteen years ago. Thereafter, I enslaved further by volunteering in Organisations so and so. As it stands, you are the only one who may be the best Master.’ It is like raising your poster high in a demonstration or having the fattest muscles and chest fit to be considered a rugby player.

It happens that you are ambitious and many jobs can be bent to your type of degree. Your do a spiral of mails. Anxiously you wait for responses that never come. Was my cv even seen? Or was there a requirement that I did not consider? My brothers stop that nonsense. Unless your father got a hand in that vacancy you are unlikely to be considered even for an interview. 

Because you had a person connecting you in that organization at least you are called in on the day of interview. You must have highly nagged the person because when you tell them once that you need a job they try to forget making you wonder whether you had immediately gotten one after you parted. There are promises and favours to fulfill them. Or else you won’t receive least of a regret note.

The cheap interview keeps you warming for it, trying best how you will sound modest, appeal that you are qualified and employ words that sincerely aren’t yours. Any psychopath (sociopath) can score well in an interview. Any lazy man or average woman gifted in oratory defense can pass. One can find expected questions online or from any other person ever involved in such. They are the same! And stupid men and women make your audience at the D-time all ears to ask their clichés as you joust in choreographing bushfire answers. 

How does it happen that one person is deemed most qualified? A joke. How does ten minutes of familiarization inform you that a man is better than the other? How do you expect him to narrow down all his gifts, doings, expectations and all that in ten minutes? Our outward personalities are not necessarily our inward abilities. A sociopath is therefore a more likely candidate for that job. Aren’t our institutions full of them? They speak well, nag their way through, can do anything to edit the results and will employ the same to rise in the ladders. A solution for this would be that a lottery should be employed and the names put on dices. Toss them and whoever settles on top is the guy. It would be fair and of sure chance than giving marks on unworthy questions. 

So what happens with the rest, equally qualified in my view but not sociopathic enough to be the best? Don’t they need an economic uplift? Can’t they also do a satisfactory job? Don’t tell me that their chance is in another institution. He or she should opt for business, isn’t it so? Perchance he may get through. 

It is time we reconsidered because all of us are equally betrothed to chances. None got a better chance over another unless it is on the bias of humanity.